<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: amaroK portable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://consistencies.net/20050702/amarok-portable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://consistencies.net/20050702/amarok-portable/</link>
	<description>..but who cares about anyway?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:08:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://consistencies.net/20050702/amarok-portable/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consistencies.net/?p=92#comment-188</guid>
		<description>You can run amaroK on OS X with Fink unstable.  I&#039;ve done it and it works very well.  The hard part of course is dealing with the Fink inconsistencies...I had to hack a few packages to get them to build correctly (submitted the info to devs, but don&#039;t know if they fixed it).  All in all though, if you really want amaroK on OS X it&#039;s well worth the time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can run amaroK on OS X with Fink unstable.  I&#8217;ve done it and it works very well.  The hard part of course is dealing with the Fink inconsistencies&#8230;I had to hack a few packages to get them to build correctly (submitted the info to devs, but don&#8217;t know if they fixed it).  All in all though, if you really want amaroK on OS X it&#8217;s well worth the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
